thumper
05-10-2006, 11:31 AM
I consider her work a clever mix of fact with some odd conclusions thrown in that are either counter-intel or simply meant to be entertaining.
in any case, like all good propaganda they have to tell the truth at least MOST of the time.
I'd like your guys' opinion on this article:
American President States World War III Has Begun As Russian Forces Redeploy To Protect Motherland
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Russian Subscribers
What the world has known for the past 5 years, the American President has today acknowledged that World War III has begun, and as we can read as reported by the AFP News Service in their article titled "Bush says fight against terror is World War III (http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1028003&CatID=9)", and which says:
"United States President George W Bush has said the September 11 revolt of passengers against their hijackers on board Flight 93 had struck the first blow of World War III. In an interview with the financial news network CNBC on Friday, Bush said he had yet to see the recently released film of the uprising, a dramatic portrayal of events on the United Airlines plane before it crashed in a Pennsylvania field. (http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1028003&CatID=9)
But he said he agreed with the description of David Beamer, whose son Todd died in the crash, who in a Wall Street Journal commentary last month called it "our first successful counterattack in our homeland in this new global war – World War III". Bush said, "I believe that. I believe that it was the first counterattack to World War III." (http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1028003&CatID=9)
It should also be noticed that in this CNBC interview the American President further acknowledged that the events of September 11, 2001 were not either unknown or unprovoked, but were rather, and we quote him, “…the first counterattack to World War III (http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1028003&CatID=9).”
As the United States also increases their massive Military Troop deployments around the world it has become more than apparent that their next goal is to surround Russia with their forces to prevent President Putin from moving against the Americans in their bid to take total control of the oil reserves of both Central Asia and the Middle East.
To the American people themselves many warnings have been shouted at them about these events, including from the great Soviet Dissident and Nobel Prize Winner Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, and whose warning we can read as reported by the Hindu News Service in their article titled "Nobel laureate accuses US, NATO of encircling Russia (http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/003200604280921.htm)", and which says:
"Nobel laureate and former Soviet dissident, Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, in a newspaper interview accused the United States and NATO of seeking to encircle Russia, and praised President Vladimir Putin for working to restore a strong state. In a rare interview, the reclusive 87-year-old author, who rose to prominence for his accounts of Soviet dictator Josef Stalin's repression and labour camps, told the liberal weekly 'Moscow News' that NATO's ultimate aim was the loss of Russia's sovereignty, according to a full text of the interview posted on its web site edition on Thursday. (http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/003200604280921.htm)
"Though it is clear that present-day Russia poses no threat to it, NATO is methodically and persistently building up its military machine - into the east of Europe and surrounding Russia from the south," Solzhenitsyn was quoted as saying. "This involves open material and ideological support for 'colour revolutions' and the paraxodical forcing of North Atlantic interests on Central Asia," he reportedly said, adding that there was "little substantial difference" between the actions of the US and NATO. (http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/003200604280921.htm)
"All this leaves no doubt that they are preparing to completely encircle Russia and deprive it of its sovereignty," Solzhenitsyn was quoted as saying." (http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/003200604280921.htm)
The United States has likewise begun their expected propaganda attack against Russia in order to condition their peoples for this next escalation of World War III, and as we can read as reported by Canada’s Globe and Mail News Service in their article titled "Kremlin is fuming after rebuke by Cheney (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060505.RUSSIA05/TPStory/TPInternational/Europe/)", and which says:
"Simmering tensions between Russia and the United States broke into the open yesterday after U.S. Vice-President Dick Cheney accused the Kremlin of restricting the freedom of its own people and using its energy supplies as blackmail to fight democracy abroad. The Kremlin answered sharply, saying its energy policy isn't used for political leverage and suggesting the United States needs to get used to Russia's newly assertive role in the world. (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060505.RUSSIA05/TPStory/TPInternational/Europe/)
Washington's strongest rebuke of Russia yet comes at a tense moment in U.S.-Russia relations as the White House pushes for Kremlin co-operation on Iranian nuclear issues and many Russians say their country has returned to a Cold War footing." (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060505.RUSSIA05/TPStory/TPInternational/Europe/)
The hypocrisy of the United States Vice President equating Russia’s marketing its gas and oil at established world prices being equated with ‘blackmail’ goes beyond astounding except for the fact that the American peoples themselves are unaware of the full sinister implications of their present Military Regime, and which has been further noticed by others, and as we can see exampled by the American dissident AntiWar.Com News Service in their report titled "Comrade Cheney vs. President Putin: The Sovietization of American foreign policy (http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8942)", and which says:
"So what is this "blackmail" Cheney is talking about? It is the Russians abandoning the doctrine of socialist internationalism and putting good old capitalist theory into practice. Instead of continuing to offer oil and natural gas to Ukraine at below-market prices, they insist on charging the price set by the international market. To Cheney, this is "blackmail": an economist would call it capitalism." (http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8942)
But the more ominous signs now emanating from the Military Regime of the United States are those showing their rapid descent into the Dark Religion last followed by the German Nazi Empire of last century, and which we have touched upon many times, including our April 16th report titled "Mysterious ‘Ritual’ Performed By United States Military Forces In Babylon Raises Concerns Of Muslim And Russian Orthodox Religious Leaders (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index898.htm)", and wherein we had detailed the dark rituals now being performed by these strange people.
Not being realized by the American people themselves are the intentions of their Military Leaders to transfer the American seat of government from North America, after the destruction of some of their largest cities, to Iraq in their quest for the establishment of what they are calling the ‘New Babylon’, and from which their plans call for this being the new capital of the world.
To the staggering size of the new capital of Babylon being built by these Americans the world eyes in utter amazement but the American people still fail to see the full implications of, and of which we can read as reported by the Australian News Service in their article titled "Baghdad anger at Bush's undiplomatic palace (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,19019060-2703,00.html)", and which says:
"The question puzzles and enrages a city: how is it that the Americans cannot keep the electricity running in Baghdad for more than a couple of hours a day, yet still manage to build the biggest embassy on earth? Irritation grows as residents deprived of air conditioning and running water three years after the US-led invasion watch the massive US embassy they call "George W's palace" rising from the banks of the Tigris. (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,19019060-2703,00.html)
In the pavement cafes, people moan that the structure is bigger than anything Saddam Hussein built. They are not impressed by the architects' claims that it will be visible from space and cover an area larger than Vatican City. (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,19019060-2703,00.html)
"The design of the compound is supposed to be a secret, but you cannot hide the concrete contours of the 21 buildings that are taking shape. Looming over the skyline, the embassy has the distinction of being the only big US building project in Iraq that is on time and within budget. In a week when Washington revealed a startling list of missed deadlines and overspending on building projects, Congress was told the bill for the embassy was $US592million ($772million). (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,19019060-2703,00.html)
The heavily guarded 42ha site - which will have a 3m-thick perimeter wall - has hundreds of workers swarming on scaffolding. Locals are bitter that the Kuwaiti contractor has employed only foreign staff." (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,19019060-2703,00.html)
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index904.htm
in any case, like all good propaganda they have to tell the truth at least MOST of the time.
I'd like your guys' opinion on this article:
American President States World War III Has Begun As Russian Forces Redeploy To Protect Motherland
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Russian Subscribers
What the world has known for the past 5 years, the American President has today acknowledged that World War III has begun, and as we can read as reported by the AFP News Service in their article titled "Bush says fight against terror is World War III (http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1028003&CatID=9)", and which says:
"United States President George W Bush has said the September 11 revolt of passengers against their hijackers on board Flight 93 had struck the first blow of World War III. In an interview with the financial news network CNBC on Friday, Bush said he had yet to see the recently released film of the uprising, a dramatic portrayal of events on the United Airlines plane before it crashed in a Pennsylvania field. (http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1028003&CatID=9)
But he said he agreed with the description of David Beamer, whose son Todd died in the crash, who in a Wall Street Journal commentary last month called it "our first successful counterattack in our homeland in this new global war – World War III". Bush said, "I believe that. I believe that it was the first counterattack to World War III." (http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1028003&CatID=9)
It should also be noticed that in this CNBC interview the American President further acknowledged that the events of September 11, 2001 were not either unknown or unprovoked, but were rather, and we quote him, “…the first counterattack to World War III (http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1028003&CatID=9).”
As the United States also increases their massive Military Troop deployments around the world it has become more than apparent that their next goal is to surround Russia with their forces to prevent President Putin from moving against the Americans in their bid to take total control of the oil reserves of both Central Asia and the Middle East.
To the American people themselves many warnings have been shouted at them about these events, including from the great Soviet Dissident and Nobel Prize Winner Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, and whose warning we can read as reported by the Hindu News Service in their article titled "Nobel laureate accuses US, NATO of encircling Russia (http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/003200604280921.htm)", and which says:
"Nobel laureate and former Soviet dissident, Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, in a newspaper interview accused the United States and NATO of seeking to encircle Russia, and praised President Vladimir Putin for working to restore a strong state. In a rare interview, the reclusive 87-year-old author, who rose to prominence for his accounts of Soviet dictator Josef Stalin's repression and labour camps, told the liberal weekly 'Moscow News' that NATO's ultimate aim was the loss of Russia's sovereignty, according to a full text of the interview posted on its web site edition on Thursday. (http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/003200604280921.htm)
"Though it is clear that present-day Russia poses no threat to it, NATO is methodically and persistently building up its military machine - into the east of Europe and surrounding Russia from the south," Solzhenitsyn was quoted as saying. "This involves open material and ideological support for 'colour revolutions' and the paraxodical forcing of North Atlantic interests on Central Asia," he reportedly said, adding that there was "little substantial difference" between the actions of the US and NATO. (http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/003200604280921.htm)
"All this leaves no doubt that they are preparing to completely encircle Russia and deprive it of its sovereignty," Solzhenitsyn was quoted as saying." (http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/003200604280921.htm)
The United States has likewise begun their expected propaganda attack against Russia in order to condition their peoples for this next escalation of World War III, and as we can read as reported by Canada’s Globe and Mail News Service in their article titled "Kremlin is fuming after rebuke by Cheney (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060505.RUSSIA05/TPStory/TPInternational/Europe/)", and which says:
"Simmering tensions between Russia and the United States broke into the open yesterday after U.S. Vice-President Dick Cheney accused the Kremlin of restricting the freedom of its own people and using its energy supplies as blackmail to fight democracy abroad. The Kremlin answered sharply, saying its energy policy isn't used for political leverage and suggesting the United States needs to get used to Russia's newly assertive role in the world. (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060505.RUSSIA05/TPStory/TPInternational/Europe/)
Washington's strongest rebuke of Russia yet comes at a tense moment in U.S.-Russia relations as the White House pushes for Kremlin co-operation on Iranian nuclear issues and many Russians say their country has returned to a Cold War footing." (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20060505.RUSSIA05/TPStory/TPInternational/Europe/)
The hypocrisy of the United States Vice President equating Russia’s marketing its gas and oil at established world prices being equated with ‘blackmail’ goes beyond astounding except for the fact that the American peoples themselves are unaware of the full sinister implications of their present Military Regime, and which has been further noticed by others, and as we can see exampled by the American dissident AntiWar.Com News Service in their report titled "Comrade Cheney vs. President Putin: The Sovietization of American foreign policy (http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8942)", and which says:
"So what is this "blackmail" Cheney is talking about? It is the Russians abandoning the doctrine of socialist internationalism and putting good old capitalist theory into practice. Instead of continuing to offer oil and natural gas to Ukraine at below-market prices, they insist on charging the price set by the international market. To Cheney, this is "blackmail": an economist would call it capitalism." (http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8942)
But the more ominous signs now emanating from the Military Regime of the United States are those showing their rapid descent into the Dark Religion last followed by the German Nazi Empire of last century, and which we have touched upon many times, including our April 16th report titled "Mysterious ‘Ritual’ Performed By United States Military Forces In Babylon Raises Concerns Of Muslim And Russian Orthodox Religious Leaders (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index898.htm)", and wherein we had detailed the dark rituals now being performed by these strange people.
Not being realized by the American people themselves are the intentions of their Military Leaders to transfer the American seat of government from North America, after the destruction of some of their largest cities, to Iraq in their quest for the establishment of what they are calling the ‘New Babylon’, and from which their plans call for this being the new capital of the world.
To the staggering size of the new capital of Babylon being built by these Americans the world eyes in utter amazement but the American people still fail to see the full implications of, and of which we can read as reported by the Australian News Service in their article titled "Baghdad anger at Bush's undiplomatic palace (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,19019060-2703,00.html)", and which says:
"The question puzzles and enrages a city: how is it that the Americans cannot keep the electricity running in Baghdad for more than a couple of hours a day, yet still manage to build the biggest embassy on earth? Irritation grows as residents deprived of air conditioning and running water three years after the US-led invasion watch the massive US embassy they call "George W's palace" rising from the banks of the Tigris. (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,19019060-2703,00.html)
In the pavement cafes, people moan that the structure is bigger than anything Saddam Hussein built. They are not impressed by the architects' claims that it will be visible from space and cover an area larger than Vatican City. (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,19019060-2703,00.html)
"The design of the compound is supposed to be a secret, but you cannot hide the concrete contours of the 21 buildings that are taking shape. Looming over the skyline, the embassy has the distinction of being the only big US building project in Iraq that is on time and within budget. In a week when Washington revealed a startling list of missed deadlines and overspending on building projects, Congress was told the bill for the embassy was $US592million ($772million). (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,19019060-2703,00.html)
The heavily guarded 42ha site - which will have a 3m-thick perimeter wall - has hundreds of workers swarming on scaffolding. Locals are bitter that the Kuwaiti contractor has employed only foreign staff." (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,19019060-2703,00.html)
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index904.htm