Gold9472
09-09-2006, 10:11 AM
The Media Is Very Picky... I Wonder Why?
By Jon Gold
9/9/2006
Some of you may have seen the news that Professor Jones has been placed on "paid leave (http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,645199800,00.html)" because BYU is, "concerned about the increasingly speculative and accusatory nature of these statements by Dr. Jones." in regards to Government complicity and 9/11.
If you go to www.google.com, and type in "Professor Jones, Associated Press", you will see SEVERAL stories blasted across the internet.
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/jonespaidleave.gif
Why is it that the media has decided to cover this story to the level that it has?
If you think about how pundits on the television "spin" information, it's not hard to see how this information can be spun.
The physics professor from BYU that brought the so called, "9/11 Truth Movement" credibility has been placed on "paid leave". Obviously because he is considered to be a nut."
Professor Jones is not a "nut", but it's not hard to see today's corporate media go that route.
Also in the news as of late, has been mention of Nico Haupt (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14723997/page/1/), and his idea that no planes struck the towers on 9/11. The majority of the 9/11 Truth Movement, probably 99.99% of it, does not endorse this theory, nor do we promote it. However, the media has decided to focus on him for some reason.
Considering the experience I had at work yesterday where a friend of mine said at a lunch gathering, "Hey guys... did you see the article about Jon and his friends on MSNBC today? They actually think no planes hit the towers on 9/11." which was followed by a group giggle, it's not hard to figure out why.
Why is it when a new movie like, "9/11: Press For Truth (http://www.911pressfortruth.com)" comes out, the media chooses to focus on the right-wing, full of lies "docudrama" called, "The Path To 9/11"?
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/pathto911.gif
Why is it when news like the family members (http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11889) stating that the 9/11 Commission was "derelict in its duties", and that they question the "veracity of the entire report", no one but Rawstory chooses to cover it?
Why is it when the family members (http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=12338) send out a press release stating that they are going to be calling for a new investigation on 9/11/2006, NO ONE in the mainstream media covers it?
Considering the fact that this all could end if the media would just do its' job, and that the corporations who own the media are making money off of the death and destruction of the wars, and they OBVIOUSLY don't want it to end, is it really hard to figure out why?
By Jon Gold
9/9/2006
Some of you may have seen the news that Professor Jones has been placed on "paid leave (http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,645199800,00.html)" because BYU is, "concerned about the increasingly speculative and accusatory nature of these statements by Dr. Jones." in regards to Government complicity and 9/11.
If you go to www.google.com, and type in "Professor Jones, Associated Press", you will see SEVERAL stories blasted across the internet.
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/jonespaidleave.gif
Why is it that the media has decided to cover this story to the level that it has?
If you think about how pundits on the television "spin" information, it's not hard to see how this information can be spun.
The physics professor from BYU that brought the so called, "9/11 Truth Movement" credibility has been placed on "paid leave". Obviously because he is considered to be a nut."
Professor Jones is not a "nut", but it's not hard to see today's corporate media go that route.
Also in the news as of late, has been mention of Nico Haupt (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14723997/page/1/), and his idea that no planes struck the towers on 9/11. The majority of the 9/11 Truth Movement, probably 99.99% of it, does not endorse this theory, nor do we promote it. However, the media has decided to focus on him for some reason.
Considering the experience I had at work yesterday where a friend of mine said at a lunch gathering, "Hey guys... did you see the article about Jon and his friends on MSNBC today? They actually think no planes hit the towers on 9/11." which was followed by a group giggle, it's not hard to figure out why.
Why is it when a new movie like, "9/11: Press For Truth (http://www.911pressfortruth.com)" comes out, the media chooses to focus on the right-wing, full of lies "docudrama" called, "The Path To 9/11"?
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/pathto911.gif
Why is it when news like the family members (http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11889) stating that the 9/11 Commission was "derelict in its duties", and that they question the "veracity of the entire report", no one but Rawstory chooses to cover it?
Why is it when the family members (http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=12338) send out a press release stating that they are going to be calling for a new investigation on 9/11/2006, NO ONE in the mainstream media covers it?
Considering the fact that this all could end if the media would just do its' job, and that the corporations who own the media are making money off of the death and destruction of the wars, and they OBVIOUSLY don't want it to end, is it really hard to figure out why?