Gold9472
01-25-2007, 09:53 AM
Dropping like flies
Resignations of U.S. attorneys raise suspicion of politically motivated Justice Department purge.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/4497086.html
1/25/2007
In the past year 11 U.S. attorneys have resigned their positions, some under pressure from their Justice Department superiors and the White House, even through they had commendable performance records.
Democratic senators are concerned that the high turnover is linked to an obscure, recently passed provision of the Patriot Act. The provision allows the Bush administration to fill vacancies with interim prosecutors for the remainder of the president's term without submitting them to the Senate for confirmation. Previously, interim appointments were made by a vote of federal judges in the districts served by the outgoing U.S. attorneys.
U.S. Sen. Mark Pryor, D-Ark., contends that in his state U.S. Attorney Bud Cummins was improperly ousted in favor of a protege of Bush political adviser Karl Rove. Likewise in California, U.S. Attorneys Carol Lam of San Diego and Kevin Ryan of San Francisco were forced from their positions. Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., alleged that Lam fell out of favor with her Washington bosses for spearheading the bribery prosecution and conviction of Republican Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham last year. Lam reportedly had other politicians in her sights.
"I am particularly concerned because of the inference ... that is drawn to manipulation in the lineup of cases to be prosecuted by a U.S. attorney," Feinstein stated. "In the San Diego case, at the very least, we have people from the FBI indicating that Carol Lam has not only been a straight shooter but a very good prosecutor."
U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales denied political motives figured in the multiple resignations of top prosecutors, and pledged that all interim appointments would be submitted to the Senate for confirmation. He reiterated that U.S. attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president and can be removed for a number of reasons, including job performance and their standing in their districts. That isn't good enough for Feinstein and her Democratic colleagues, who have introduced legislation to reinstate the appointment of interim prosecutors by federal judges.
Gonzales is correct that the president is vested with the power to appoint U.S. attorneys. Unfortunately, the Patriot Act change eliminated the ability of the Senate to exercise its constitutional oversight of those nominations to make sure they are qualified and not simply political plums handed out to supporters in the waning years of the administration.
The attorney general's pledge to bring the wave of interim appointees before the Senate for confirmation is welcome, providing it is done in a speedy fashion. Still, the Patriot Act needs to be amended to restore judicial appointment of interims.
No president should be able to fire top government prosecutors from their positions for political reasons and then install successors without a thorough vetting by the constitutionally charged legislative body.
Resignations of U.S. attorneys raise suspicion of politically motivated Justice Department purge.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/4497086.html
1/25/2007
In the past year 11 U.S. attorneys have resigned their positions, some under pressure from their Justice Department superiors and the White House, even through they had commendable performance records.
Democratic senators are concerned that the high turnover is linked to an obscure, recently passed provision of the Patriot Act. The provision allows the Bush administration to fill vacancies with interim prosecutors for the remainder of the president's term without submitting them to the Senate for confirmation. Previously, interim appointments were made by a vote of federal judges in the districts served by the outgoing U.S. attorneys.
U.S. Sen. Mark Pryor, D-Ark., contends that in his state U.S. Attorney Bud Cummins was improperly ousted in favor of a protege of Bush political adviser Karl Rove. Likewise in California, U.S. Attorneys Carol Lam of San Diego and Kevin Ryan of San Francisco were forced from their positions. Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., alleged that Lam fell out of favor with her Washington bosses for spearheading the bribery prosecution and conviction of Republican Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham last year. Lam reportedly had other politicians in her sights.
"I am particularly concerned because of the inference ... that is drawn to manipulation in the lineup of cases to be prosecuted by a U.S. attorney," Feinstein stated. "In the San Diego case, at the very least, we have people from the FBI indicating that Carol Lam has not only been a straight shooter but a very good prosecutor."
U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales denied political motives figured in the multiple resignations of top prosecutors, and pledged that all interim appointments would be submitted to the Senate for confirmation. He reiterated that U.S. attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president and can be removed for a number of reasons, including job performance and their standing in their districts. That isn't good enough for Feinstein and her Democratic colleagues, who have introduced legislation to reinstate the appointment of interim prosecutors by federal judges.
Gonzales is correct that the president is vested with the power to appoint U.S. attorneys. Unfortunately, the Patriot Act change eliminated the ability of the Senate to exercise its constitutional oversight of those nominations to make sure they are qualified and not simply political plums handed out to supporters in the waning years of the administration.
The attorney general's pledge to bring the wave of interim appointees before the Senate for confirmation is welcome, providing it is done in a speedy fashion. Still, the Patriot Act needs to be amended to restore judicial appointment of interims.
No president should be able to fire top government prosecutors from their positions for political reasons and then install successors without a thorough vetting by the constitutionally charged legislative body.