aceace
08-10-2005, 03:35 PM
Note: John McCarthy is a friend of mine and someone I trust, he showed me this article and after reading it everything makes sense now. You understand the hows and whys they are doing what they are doing, destroying America for money.
Who is John McCarthy: http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/hall/Mac.html
http://www.channelingreality.com/Psychological/changing_history.htm
Changing History
If you knew what was going to happen in the future, you could manipulate events to change history. If you have the power of money, the power of government, arrogance and no ethics or morality, and you define history as your plan for the future, then no actions are off limits to manipulate events to create the future according to your plan.
Underground War
A couple of months ago there was a program on C-Span titled Military in the 21st Century (http://www.channelingreality.com/Psychological/Barnett%201.htm). It was a presentation by Thomas Barnett based on his book, The Pentagon’s New Map. Officially, Barnett is a military strategist in the DOD Office of Force Transformation. Sub rosa (term he brought into vogue) he is a Wall Street operative and his view of the world has nothing to do with security for the United States. It has everything to do with corporate strategies for investment in China, which will come at the expense of America and the American people. Boiling it down and cutting through the crap, China has the cheapest labor in the world and that is where all the investment capital for production is moving. Knowledge jobs including research and development are moving to India. That will leave the United States with no real economic base except agriculture.
It wasn’t specifically stated, but since the United States won’t have a tax base big enough to support the military in the style to which they’ve become accustomed, they have a plan for the military to become self-supporting based on billable days for ‘protection’. The plan is to split the force into a domestic force and a global force. Of course, all the high tech, heavy hardware goes with the global force. The domestic force would be smaller and weaker - adequate for ‘protection’ of the United States. Sub rosa (I love that term) Wall Street wants protection for their investments in China. Since the military can’t serve two masters, effectively Wall Street wants to export our military.
Obviously this could never happen without ‘Ruleset’ changes. As Barnett uses the term, Rulesets are our expectations of how the world works. If you run a red light, the Ruleset says that you get a ticket and pay a fine. If you beat your wife, the Ruleset says that you go to jail. In the bigger picture of things, the Constitution is a Ruleset under which we expect our government to operate and the U.S. military was established to protect and defend the United States.
Events cause Ruleset changes. There was a time when it was not illegal to drink and drive. If a cop pulled you over and you’d had a little too much to drink, he might tell you to park the car and sleep it off, or he might just tell you to go home and be extra careful about doing it. After drunk drivers killed too many people, a change was made to the Ruleset. If you drive drunk, you go to jail. This was a slow and evolving Ruleset change. This is the normal and natural way that Rulesets change. Society sees a problem; we solve it with a Ruleset change.
Compared to other places in the world, living in the United States has always been secure. We have expectations that our government is relatively benevolent - that it serves our interests. We have laws that were for the most part enforced which provided a certainty in life. If you followed the rules, you could work, live, raise your family and have a relatively happy life. That was our Ruleset. It was our expectation of how life works - slow evolving changes that provided stability and certainty to life.
Catastrophic or emotionally traumatic events cause rapid changes in Rulesets. September 11, 2001 (http://www.channelingreality.com/Psychological/creating_enemies.htm) was just such a catastrophic event that has caused rapid Ruleset changes. It was the pivotal event to change life in the United States - to completely rewrite our Rulesets. It was the reason that the Patriot Act was implemented. The Homeland Security Department was established and many, many other changes have occurred that would not have been possible without 9-11.
If you read carefully what Thomas Barnett is saying, you will see that Barnett is laying out Wall Street and the military's vision of history and they are changing Rulesets to accommodate that vision. It is the strategic plan for the creative destruction of the United States as the New World Order of fascism rises. What is the New World Order of Fascism? It is the partnership of the multinational corporations - Information Technology in particular and our military. You might ask, "Why would he lay it out for people to see?". First of all, he was making a presentation to young officers at a military college and he was giving them the game plan sub rosa and the roadmap to promotion. Secondly, these people are like psychopathic killers who feel so clever and superior that they actually want people to know what they are doing so that their brilliance can be known.
Flashback
Prior to the year 2000, a lot was made of the Y2k problem with computer systems. Government and the public were made aware of all the potential disasters that could befall us as a result of the date rollover from 1999 to 2000. Since ours is probably one of the most highly automated countries in the world, the potential disasters from the disruptions of computer systems they described were very real. As a programmer, I bought into the disaster storyline hook, line and sinker because I know how dependent we are on computer systems. What I didn't know, and what most people didn't know was that computer systems were already being outsourced to the armies of programmers in India. So all the hype about Y2k disasters was just that - hype.
Who created the hype? Thomas Barnett. He was the Project Director assigned to study the national security implications of Y2k. They produced a report titled the Year 2000 International Security Dimension Project. In this study, they lay out all of the potential disasters and the effects that they would have on our country. But apparently, that was not all they were interested in. The following is a quote from Military in the 21st Century that is a clue that there was more going on in that study than just Y2k problems:
"Now we were interested in Y2k, but we were interested in the tech crash because we could see new rules coming in the financial sector but if you talk to people on Wall Street..."
Barnett is very clever about his wording but essentially what he is saying is that they knew that Y2k was not going to be that big of a problem. The bigger problem was going to be that the law was going to clamp down on the corporations because of the stock fraud and manipulation of the market. This indicates a corruption of Barnett and his project.
Another thing that Barnett said in his presentation was:
"It was a grand exploration of how we think about instability and crisis in this interconnected world. And that is really how Art Cebrowski really saw it. He saw it as a heuristic opportunity - an opportunity for teaching-learning because he knew there’d be unprecedented discussions between the defense dept and the rest of the U.S. government, between the government and the private sector and between America and the world. So we created a project and we called it the Year 2000 International Security Dimension Project."
In other words, it was an opportunity to really make people understand the criticality of the computer systems that run our country because most people didn't and to this day, most people don't. Enter Richard Clarke and his campaign of Y2k terror. Richard Clarke was the front man for communications with government and the public on all the potential disasters that could befall us due to the Y2k threat.
It is my personal belief that the September 11th plot was hatched out of the Year 2000 International Security Dimension Project (http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Thinktank/6926/y2krep.html). There was a convergence of principals who all stood to gain from a vertical shock and the subsequent 'Ruleset' changes that would arise from 9-11. Wall Street got what they wanted, Neo Cons got what they wanted, the Military got what they wanted. Win-Win-Win - American people lose.
Here is where it gets interesting. If you take a look the Y2k Scenario Dynamics Grid (http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Thinktank/6926/y2krep5.html) you can see how their 'predictions of the future' have become reality. Here is a quote
"life-as-we-are-coming-to-know-it in the New Economy"
Isn't it interesting that they were talking about a New Economy as a result of catastrophic disaster of computer failures that never transpired. We did have 9-11 but it didn't actually affect the economy that much. What has affected the economy was the outsourcing of jobs, Enron's extortion of California, the invasion of our country by illegal aliens, a war based on lies and the looting of the U.S. Treasury. The difference is between events that occur naturally as a result of a disaster and changes that occur as a result of engineering. There was no imperative for Bush to sign the agreement with Vajpayee to facilitate and accelerate the export of jobs. It was obvious that Enron was extorting Californians and FERC could have stopped it - but they didn't. It is obvious that our country is being invaded and laws are being broken, but they are ignoring it. Effectively, they are engineering the 'New Economy'. If that isn't a smoking gun, I don't know what is.
Who is John McCarthy: http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/hall/Mac.html
http://www.channelingreality.com/Psychological/changing_history.htm
Changing History
If you knew what was going to happen in the future, you could manipulate events to change history. If you have the power of money, the power of government, arrogance and no ethics or morality, and you define history as your plan for the future, then no actions are off limits to manipulate events to create the future according to your plan.
Underground War
A couple of months ago there was a program on C-Span titled Military in the 21st Century (http://www.channelingreality.com/Psychological/Barnett%201.htm). It was a presentation by Thomas Barnett based on his book, The Pentagon’s New Map. Officially, Barnett is a military strategist in the DOD Office of Force Transformation. Sub rosa (term he brought into vogue) he is a Wall Street operative and his view of the world has nothing to do with security for the United States. It has everything to do with corporate strategies for investment in China, which will come at the expense of America and the American people. Boiling it down and cutting through the crap, China has the cheapest labor in the world and that is where all the investment capital for production is moving. Knowledge jobs including research and development are moving to India. That will leave the United States with no real economic base except agriculture.
It wasn’t specifically stated, but since the United States won’t have a tax base big enough to support the military in the style to which they’ve become accustomed, they have a plan for the military to become self-supporting based on billable days for ‘protection’. The plan is to split the force into a domestic force and a global force. Of course, all the high tech, heavy hardware goes with the global force. The domestic force would be smaller and weaker - adequate for ‘protection’ of the United States. Sub rosa (I love that term) Wall Street wants protection for their investments in China. Since the military can’t serve two masters, effectively Wall Street wants to export our military.
Obviously this could never happen without ‘Ruleset’ changes. As Barnett uses the term, Rulesets are our expectations of how the world works. If you run a red light, the Ruleset says that you get a ticket and pay a fine. If you beat your wife, the Ruleset says that you go to jail. In the bigger picture of things, the Constitution is a Ruleset under which we expect our government to operate and the U.S. military was established to protect and defend the United States.
Events cause Ruleset changes. There was a time when it was not illegal to drink and drive. If a cop pulled you over and you’d had a little too much to drink, he might tell you to park the car and sleep it off, or he might just tell you to go home and be extra careful about doing it. After drunk drivers killed too many people, a change was made to the Ruleset. If you drive drunk, you go to jail. This was a slow and evolving Ruleset change. This is the normal and natural way that Rulesets change. Society sees a problem; we solve it with a Ruleset change.
Compared to other places in the world, living in the United States has always been secure. We have expectations that our government is relatively benevolent - that it serves our interests. We have laws that were for the most part enforced which provided a certainty in life. If you followed the rules, you could work, live, raise your family and have a relatively happy life. That was our Ruleset. It was our expectation of how life works - slow evolving changes that provided stability and certainty to life.
Catastrophic or emotionally traumatic events cause rapid changes in Rulesets. September 11, 2001 (http://www.channelingreality.com/Psychological/creating_enemies.htm) was just such a catastrophic event that has caused rapid Ruleset changes. It was the pivotal event to change life in the United States - to completely rewrite our Rulesets. It was the reason that the Patriot Act was implemented. The Homeland Security Department was established and many, many other changes have occurred that would not have been possible without 9-11.
If you read carefully what Thomas Barnett is saying, you will see that Barnett is laying out Wall Street and the military's vision of history and they are changing Rulesets to accommodate that vision. It is the strategic plan for the creative destruction of the United States as the New World Order of fascism rises. What is the New World Order of Fascism? It is the partnership of the multinational corporations - Information Technology in particular and our military. You might ask, "Why would he lay it out for people to see?". First of all, he was making a presentation to young officers at a military college and he was giving them the game plan sub rosa and the roadmap to promotion. Secondly, these people are like psychopathic killers who feel so clever and superior that they actually want people to know what they are doing so that their brilliance can be known.
Flashback
Prior to the year 2000, a lot was made of the Y2k problem with computer systems. Government and the public were made aware of all the potential disasters that could befall us as a result of the date rollover from 1999 to 2000. Since ours is probably one of the most highly automated countries in the world, the potential disasters from the disruptions of computer systems they described were very real. As a programmer, I bought into the disaster storyline hook, line and sinker because I know how dependent we are on computer systems. What I didn't know, and what most people didn't know was that computer systems were already being outsourced to the armies of programmers in India. So all the hype about Y2k disasters was just that - hype.
Who created the hype? Thomas Barnett. He was the Project Director assigned to study the national security implications of Y2k. They produced a report titled the Year 2000 International Security Dimension Project. In this study, they lay out all of the potential disasters and the effects that they would have on our country. But apparently, that was not all they were interested in. The following is a quote from Military in the 21st Century that is a clue that there was more going on in that study than just Y2k problems:
"Now we were interested in Y2k, but we were interested in the tech crash because we could see new rules coming in the financial sector but if you talk to people on Wall Street..."
Barnett is very clever about his wording but essentially what he is saying is that they knew that Y2k was not going to be that big of a problem. The bigger problem was going to be that the law was going to clamp down on the corporations because of the stock fraud and manipulation of the market. This indicates a corruption of Barnett and his project.
Another thing that Barnett said in his presentation was:
"It was a grand exploration of how we think about instability and crisis in this interconnected world. And that is really how Art Cebrowski really saw it. He saw it as a heuristic opportunity - an opportunity for teaching-learning because he knew there’d be unprecedented discussions between the defense dept and the rest of the U.S. government, between the government and the private sector and between America and the world. So we created a project and we called it the Year 2000 International Security Dimension Project."
In other words, it was an opportunity to really make people understand the criticality of the computer systems that run our country because most people didn't and to this day, most people don't. Enter Richard Clarke and his campaign of Y2k terror. Richard Clarke was the front man for communications with government and the public on all the potential disasters that could befall us due to the Y2k threat.
It is my personal belief that the September 11th plot was hatched out of the Year 2000 International Security Dimension Project (http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Thinktank/6926/y2krep.html). There was a convergence of principals who all stood to gain from a vertical shock and the subsequent 'Ruleset' changes that would arise from 9-11. Wall Street got what they wanted, Neo Cons got what they wanted, the Military got what they wanted. Win-Win-Win - American people lose.
Here is where it gets interesting. If you take a look the Y2k Scenario Dynamics Grid (http://www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Thinktank/6926/y2krep5.html) you can see how their 'predictions of the future' have become reality. Here is a quote
"life-as-we-are-coming-to-know-it in the New Economy"
Isn't it interesting that they were talking about a New Economy as a result of catastrophic disaster of computer failures that never transpired. We did have 9-11 but it didn't actually affect the economy that much. What has affected the economy was the outsourcing of jobs, Enron's extortion of California, the invasion of our country by illegal aliens, a war based on lies and the looting of the U.S. Treasury. The difference is between events that occur naturally as a result of a disaster and changes that occur as a result of engineering. There was no imperative for Bush to sign the agreement with Vajpayee to facilitate and accelerate the export of jobs. It was obvious that Enron was extorting Californians and FERC could have stopped it - but they didn't. It is obvious that our country is being invaded and laws are being broken, but they are ignoring it. Effectively, they are engineering the 'New Economy'. If that isn't a smoking gun, I don't know what is.