Gold9472
02-11-2006, 10:20 PM
Bioterror
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/02/bioterror.html
2/10/2006
The anthrax attacks of 2001 and nerve agent scare of 2006 help to clarify and explain what is happening to our country.
The anthrax attacks -- which were sent along with notes purportedly written by Islamic terrorists -- used a weaponized anthrax strain from the top U.S. bioweapons facility, the Fort Detrick military base (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A49502-2001Dec15). Indeed, top bioweapons experts have stated that the anthrax attack may have been a CIA test "gone wrong" (http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=288522002); and see this article by a former NSA and naval intelligence officer (http://www.counterpunch.org/madsenanthrax.html).
Interestingly, White House staff began taking the anti-anthrax medicine before the Anthrax attacks occurred (http://www.judicialwatch.org/2953.shtml).
Moreover, the only congress people mailed anthrax-containing letters were key Democrats, and the attacks occurred one week before passage of the freedom-curtailing Patriot Act (http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/11/21/anthrax/index_np.html), which seems to have scared them and the rest of congress into passing that act without even reading it (this is not a partisan issue, since this author believes that party affiliation is not a reliable indicator of loyalty to the Constitution; rather, the senators targeted just happened to pose a threat in 2001 to passage of the Patriot Act).
History appears to be repeating itself this week. Only hours after sensors in a U.S. Senate office building detected a nerve agent (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=a4l0o5od.OnY&refer=top_world_news), key Senators suddenly reversed direction and announced a capitulation to the White House's demands on the renewal and expansion of the Patriot Act (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/patriot_act).
The anthrax attacks and nerve agent "scare" help to illustrate that America's enemies are inside the gates, and that they are more than willing to use scare tactics and even false flag terror methods (http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/12/introduction-to-false-flag-terror.html) to achieve their objectives.
While 9/11 was mainly aimed at the American people, the anthrax attacks and nerve gas scare were apparently aimed at Congress. Specifically, the bioterror scares appear to have been launched in order to instill sufficient fear and disruption among the few remaining legislators who still honor the Constitution that they would be willing to let the Patriot Act be passed and then reenacted without real analysis or debate.
Without 9/11, the American public would not have given in to the Bush administration's imperial agenda. Without the bioterror scares, Congress would not have let the Constitution be demolished so quickly. A few legislators would probably have successfully stood against the Patriot Act, or at least demanded that that law be read and analyzed before it was adopted.
Indeed, America is not alone in playing this game. Draconian "anti-terror" legislation recently passed in England right after a bioterror scare.
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/02/bioterror.html
2/10/2006
The anthrax attacks of 2001 and nerve agent scare of 2006 help to clarify and explain what is happening to our country.
The anthrax attacks -- which were sent along with notes purportedly written by Islamic terrorists -- used a weaponized anthrax strain from the top U.S. bioweapons facility, the Fort Detrick military base (http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A49502-2001Dec15). Indeed, top bioweapons experts have stated that the anthrax attack may have been a CIA test "gone wrong" (http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/international.cfm?id=288522002); and see this article by a former NSA and naval intelligence officer (http://www.counterpunch.org/madsenanthrax.html).
Interestingly, White House staff began taking the anti-anthrax medicine before the Anthrax attacks occurred (http://www.judicialwatch.org/2953.shtml).
Moreover, the only congress people mailed anthrax-containing letters were key Democrats, and the attacks occurred one week before passage of the freedom-curtailing Patriot Act (http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/11/21/anthrax/index_np.html), which seems to have scared them and the rest of congress into passing that act without even reading it (this is not a partisan issue, since this author believes that party affiliation is not a reliable indicator of loyalty to the Constitution; rather, the senators targeted just happened to pose a threat in 2001 to passage of the Patriot Act).
History appears to be repeating itself this week. Only hours after sensors in a U.S. Senate office building detected a nerve agent (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=a4l0o5od.OnY&refer=top_world_news), key Senators suddenly reversed direction and announced a capitulation to the White House's demands on the renewal and expansion of the Patriot Act (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/patriot_act).
The anthrax attacks and nerve agent "scare" help to illustrate that America's enemies are inside the gates, and that they are more than willing to use scare tactics and even false flag terror methods (http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/12/introduction-to-false-flag-terror.html) to achieve their objectives.
While 9/11 was mainly aimed at the American people, the anthrax attacks and nerve gas scare were apparently aimed at Congress. Specifically, the bioterror scares appear to have been launched in order to instill sufficient fear and disruption among the few remaining legislators who still honor the Constitution that they would be willing to let the Patriot Act be passed and then reenacted without real analysis or debate.
Without 9/11, the American public would not have given in to the Bush administration's imperial agenda. Without the bioterror scares, Congress would not have let the Constitution be demolished so quickly. A few legislators would probably have successfully stood against the Patriot Act, or at least demanded that that law be read and analyzed before it was adopted.
Indeed, America is not alone in playing this game. Draconian "anti-terror" legislation recently passed in England right after a bioterror scare.