A Fallen Hero - Video Inside

Some 9/11 victims weren't compensated

http://www.northjersey.com/news/nationalpolitics/17212877.html

BY HERB JACKSON
WASHINGTON CORRESPONDENT
Wednesday, April 2, 2008

More than 100 people who developed serious illnesses from exposure to Ground Zero overflowed a Capitol Hill hearing room Tuesday and two House subcommittees debated whether the government should compensate them.

The victims, including police, firefighters, construction workers and even former bus driver Gil Gonzalez of Jersey City, likely would have qualified for federal payments from a fund created in 2001, only their symptoms showed up too late.

The 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund paid out more than $7 billion in taxpayer funds to nearly 5,600 survivors and victims, but was required by law to stop accepting claims in December 2003.

Gonzalez used to drive NJ Transit's No. 80 bus route in Jersey City, but after 9/11 spent a couple weeks taking Port Authority police officers from Journal Square through the Holland Tunnel, which was closed to other traffic, to Ground Zero.

"I was approximately 50 to 75 feet away from the pile," Gonzalez said, referring to the burning rubble of the collapsed twin towers. "We would also provide transportation to firefighters already there from one part of Ground Zero to another part of Ground Zero. We weren't supposed to have done that, but we did anyway."

About three months later, he started having trouble breathing, but doctors X-rayed him and found no problems. It wasn't until later that he was diagnosed with asthma and after that, blood clots, an aneurysm and then a stroke forced him to retire on disability.

Gonzalez watched the hearing of two House Judiciary subcommittees from an overflow room, as did Antonio Hernandez of Succasunna. Hernandez developed lymphoma after going to work in lower Manhattan 17 days after 9/11 to lay fiber-optic cables that helped rebuild the communications network the stock markets needed to reopen.

"I was supposed to have a radiation treatment today, but I postponed it to be here," Hernandez said.

Congress members on both sides of the political aisle praised the victims, but there was a split when it came to what should be done for them.

"They need our help, not more salutes," said Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., head of one of two subcommittees. "The pain and suffering of the living victims of 9/11 is real and cannot be ignored. I think it's clear that we, as a nation, must do more."

Nadler said that while terrorists were responsible for the attack, many of the subsequent injuries would have been avoided if the federal government did a better job warning about dangerous air quality and requiring protective equipment at the collapsed twin towers.

The administrator of the 9/11 compensation fund, Kenneth R. Feinberg, said there are about 11,000 people who have filed lawsuits seeking compensation for injuries that would have been covered if the symptoms had shown up before December 2003. Many have lung ailments from breathing air that tests have shown contained asbestos, glass fibers and lead, among other things.

"The only reason they weren't paid is they didn't manifest any injury from their exposure at the World Trade Center site until after the fund was dissolved," Feinberg said. He said that over the next five to 10 years, there have been estimates that another 25,000 to 30,000 victims could come forward.

Republicans at the hearing said construction companies that responded to New York City's call for help also needed protection from the lawsuits they are facing today from former employees.

"They stepped up as corporate good Samaritans, without having to protect themselves with contracts and insurance," Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, said of the construction companies. "They worked 24/7 and did so without a profit motive. These corporate heroes should not be forgotten by their government."

King also said that if Congress creates a new compensation fund, it needs to ensure that it does not "hand the keys of the Treasury to trial lawyers."

More than 100 people who developed serious illnesses from exposure to Ground Zero overflowed a Capitol Hill hearing room Tuesday and two House subcommittees debated whether the government should compensate them.

The victims, including police, firefighters, construction workers and even former bus driver Gil Gonzalez of Jersey City, likely would have qualified for federal payments from a fund created in 2001, only their symptoms showed up too late.

The 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund paid out more than $7 billion in taxpayer funds to nearly 5,600 survivors and victims, but was required by law to stop accepting claims in December 2003.

Gonzalez used to drive NJ Transit's No. 80 bus route in Jersey City, but after 9/11 spent a couple weeks taking Port Authority police officers from Journal Square through the Holland Tunnel, which was closed to other traffic, to Ground Zero.

"I was approximately 50 to 75 feet away from the pile," Gonzalez said, referring to the burning rubble of the collapsed twin towers. "We would also provide transportation to firefighters already there from one part of Ground Zero to another part of Ground Zero. We weren't supposed to have done that, but we did anyway."

About three months later, he started having trouble breathing, but doctors X-rayed him and found no problems. It wasn't until later that he was diagnosed with asthma and after that, blood clots, an aneurysm and then a stroke forced him to retire on disability.

Gonzalez watched the hearing of two House Judiciary subcommittees from an overflow room, as did Antonio Hernandez of Succasunna. Hernandez developed lymphoma after going to work in lower Manhattan 17 days after 9/11 to lay fiber-optic cables that helped rebuild the communications network the stock markets needed to reopen.

"I was supposed to have a radiation treatment today, but I postponed it to be here," Hernandez said.

Congress members on both sides of the political aisle praised the victims, but there was a split when it came to what should be done for them.

"They need our help, not more salutes," said Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., head of one of two subcommittees. "The pain and suffering of the living victims of 9/11 is real and cannot be ignored. I think it's clear that we, as a nation, must do more."

Nadler said that while terrorists were responsible for the attack, many of the subsequent injuries would have been avoided if the federal government did a better job warning about dangerous air quality and requiring protective equipment at the collapsed twin towers.

The administrator of the 9/11 compensation fund, Kenneth R. Feinberg, said there are about 11,000 people who have filed lawsuits seeking compensation for injuries that would have been covered if the symptoms had shown up before December 2003. Many have lung ailments from breathing air that tests have shown contained asbestos, glass fibers and lead, among other things.

"The only reason they weren't paid is they didn't manifest any injury from their exposure at the World Trade Center site until after the fund was dissolved," Feinberg said. He said that over the next five to 10 years, there have been estimates that another 25,000 to 30,000 victims could come forward.

Republicans at the hearing said construction companies that responded to New York City's call for help also needed protection from the lawsuits they are facing today from former employees.

"They stepped up as corporate good Samaritans, without having to protect themselves with contracts and insurance," Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, said of the construction companies. "They worked 24/7 and did so without a profit motive. These corporate heroes should not be forgotten by their government."

King also said that if Congress creates a new compensation fund, it needs to ensure that it does not "hand the keys of the Treasury to trial lawyers."
 
'ZERO' FOR HEROES, SAYS NY-BASH POL

http://www.nypost.com/seven/04022008/news/nationalnews/zero_for_heroes__says_ny_bash_pol_104639.htm

By DAPHNE RETTER, Post Correspondent

April 2, 2008 -- WASHINGTON - A California congressman drew the fury of New York lawmakers yesterday - after he said the feds shouldn't pay another dime to help the 9/11 emergency responders who became ill after working at Ground Zero.

"I have to ask why . . . the firefighters who went there and everyone in the City of New York needs to come to the federal government," Rep. Darrell Issa, a Republican, said during a House subcommittee hearing.

"How much money has the federal government put out post-9/11, including the buckets of $10 and $20 billion we just threw at the State and the City of New York versus how much has been paid out by the City and the State of New York?" Issa asked.

"It's very simple: I can't vote for additional money for New York if I can't see why it would be appropriate to do this every single time a similar situation happens, which quite frankly includes any urban terrorist. It doesn't have to be somebody from al Qaeda. It can be someone who decides that they don't like animal testing at one of our pharmaceutical facilities."

Just minutes after a retired New York City police officer, Michael Valentin, had labored through an emotional description of the serious health problems he has endured since rushing to Ground Zero, Issa downplayed the severity of the attack.

Issa said the destruction of the World Trade Center did not involve a dirty bomb or a chemical weapon designed to make people sick.

"It simply was an aircraft, residue of the aircraft and residue of the materials used to build this building," Issa said.

Sitting nearby, Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-Brooklyn/Queens) was visibly enraged at Issa's remarks.

"The notion that this is the City of New York asking for more money because we were the point of attack on this country is absurd and insulting," Weiner fumed.

Weiner said after the hearing that Issa's comments were some of the worst "New York-bashing" he has heard on the Hill.

"I've never heard anyone speak with such contempt about our heroes as Mr. Issa did today. There was a good reason that he made his remarks and then slithered out of the committee room," Weiner said.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-Manhattan), who chaired the hearing, also defended the emergency responders.

"They gave up their health for the balance of their years because this country was attacked," Nadler said.

New York City Corporation Counsel Michael Cardozo, who testified at the hearing, blasted Issa's statement that New York was trying to get the federal government to pick up the tab for something that should be a state and city responsibility.

"Congressman, this was I believe an attack on the United States of America. It was located at Ground Zero, but it was an attack on America," Cardozo said.

Issa spokesman Frederick Hill said his boss opposes any federal effort to continue funding the now-expired victims' fund, because the case has not been made for "which unique factors make this different" from wildfires in California or the Oklahoma City bombing in 1996, which killed 167 people.
 
NY courts forced to hear 9/11 lawsuits

http://media.www.nyunews.com/media/storage/paper869/news/2008/04/02/University/Ny.Courts.Forced.To.Hear.911.Lawsuits-3297059.shtml

4/2/2008

When the World Trade Center collapsed on Sept. 11, John Feal, a city demolition supervisor, was one of thousands of responders first dispatched to clean up the rubble. But after a steel beam crushed Feal's left foot, he became permanently disabled and was forced to retire.

Like many other responders, Feal said his workman's compensation claims were repeatedly denied by the city after the emergency.

But that may change.

Feal, who founded the FealGood Foundation, a group that advocates for Sept. 11 responders, is one of nearly 10,000 workers suing the city for injuries and health problems caused by unsafe conditions at ground zero during cleanup. And thanks to a recent federal court decision, they may be one step closer to seeing a settlement.

The U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last week that New York City is not immune to WTC workers' claims. In the decision, the appellate court stated, "private contractors are paid for their services and able to pass along the cost of liability protection to the government."

The Second Circuit decision does not necessarily mean that the 10,000 responders will receive compensation. However, the decision indicates that these lawsuits can move closer to trial or settlement.

Many of the responders have severe respiratory illnesses and other ailments they attribute to improper protection by the city from the dust at the World Trade Center site.

The city argued, however, that it had immunity from the lawsuits because it was responding to an emergency situation, which required an "extraordinary response," according to a statement. When a Manhattan district court said there was not enough evidence for immunity, the city appealed to the Second Circuit Court, which upheld the district court's decision.

The City Law Department's Corporation Counsel Michael A. Cardozo said in a statement that although disappointed with the decision, the law department is "confident that the city and contractors will be found to be immune from the lawsuits" in future litigations.

David E. Worby, the attorney who is representing most of the responders, told The New York Times that if the case goes to trial, the city may wind up paying billions of dollars in compensation.

Though the recent ruling is good news for Feal and his fellow responders, he wasn't completely content with the decision. Feal said in a phone interview that the decision was "a step in the right direction, but it was four to five years late." However, he added that he was "optimistic that by the end of the year, people will start getting compensated."

It is unclear what the next step in the legal battle will be. Cardozo said in the statement that the law department has not yet decided whether to appeal last week's decision to the Supreme Court.
 
Former Head Of 9/11 Fund Wants To Compensate Sick WTC Workers

http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index.jsp?stid=203&aid=80041

April 01, 2008

The former head of a fund to compensate September 11 victims supports reopening it for sick workers.

Ken Feinberg testified at a congressional hearing Tuesday that the fund should help thousands of people sickened by the dust cloud from the collapse of the World Trade Center.

He said it would be better for everyone than costly lawsuits.

Feinberg said there could be problems with re-opening the fund, since nothing similar was set up after the Oklahoma City bombing or Hurricane Katrina.

The September 11 Victim Compensation Fund was created by Congress after the 2001 attacks and distributed about $7 billion in total before expiring at the end of 2003.
 
Reps. Nadler, Lofgren Investigate Status of Compensation for 9/11 Illnesses
Hearing Marks First Congressional Inquiry into Economic Losses of Individuals

http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/ny08_nadler/911_Compensation_Investigation_040108.html

4/1/2008

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Jerrold Nadler (NY-08), Chair of the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties and Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren (CA-16), Chair of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law today held a joint oversight hearing titled, “Paying With Their Lives: The Status of Compensation for 9/11 Health Effects.”

“I am outraged that more than six years after 9/11, the heroes of that day are still waiting for the help they deserve,” said Rep. Nadler. “The federal government not only failed to protect those who died on 9/11, but it also bears responsibility for not preventing the injuries of thousands more. Obviously, none of this would have occurred were it not for the terrorists, but many of the injuries we are seeing today could have been avoided. Therefore, the federal government has a moral and legal obligation to compensate the living victims of 9/11, to provide for their health, and to attempt to make them whole for their subsequent financial losses. I am confident that, through this investigation, we can find the best way to do so, and I believe it will highlight the necessity for the House to act on the Maloney-Nadler-Fossella 9/11 Health and Compensation Act.”

“Congress has an obligation to ensure that the programs it created to assist the victims of 9/11 function efficiently and effectively,” noted Rep. Zoe Lofgren. “These programs were created to compensate victims, not to force them into torturous litigation. Since its creation, the Captive Insurance Fund has managed to only pay five claims. At the same time the fund has spent millions in litigation expenses fighting countless other claims. This hearing is an important first step in guaranteeing that the victims receive the compensation they are entitled to under the law.”

Previous Congressional investigations have focused on how the federal government should provide health care services for individuals whose health was adversely impacted by the effects of the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center. Today’s hearing is the first time that Congress focused specifically on the economic losses of those individuals. Many people incurred such losses when they became too sick to work and lost their jobs, while others have inadequate health insurance, and are struggling with exorbitant medical bills.

The hearing examined different compensation approaches used thus far to address 9/11-related economic losses, such as the World Trade Center Victim Compensation Fund (VCF) and the World Trade Center Captive Insurance Company. Reps. Nadler and Lofgren noted that the Captive Insurance Company, created by Congress with a $1 billion appropriation, has spent millions of dollars in administrative and legal costs to contest, rather than to pay, claims.

Lawmakers also examined the specific problems arising for first responders, workers, local residents, students and other individuals whose illnesses did not become apparent for months or years after September 11, as well as individuals who may become sick in the future. The hearing also provided a venue to consider possible solutions to provide the necessary relief to affected individuals who have and will continue to experience losses, but have thus far seen little or no compensation.

Also, last week, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals found that New York City and its contractors are not immune from lawsuits that have been filed by first responders, residents, area workers, students, and others who were exposed to the environmental toxins and other hazards during the clean-up at the World Trade Center site.

Rep. Nadler’s opening statement, as prepared, follows:

“First, let me thank Congresswoman Lofgren for agreeing to hold this oversight hearing. Thank you.

“This joint hearing of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties and the Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law will investigate the status of compensation for the tens of thousands of people who are suffering because of the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9/11. While other Congressional investigations have focused on the ongoing health crisis, and this committee has previously investigated the disastrous response to the environmental catastrophe, no previous inquiry has focused on compensation for the victims.

“I want to welcome our witnesses and thank them for participating. We are fortunate to have an expert panel with us today to discuss the past successes, current challenges, and proposed solutions in the ongoing struggle to provide proper compensation to the victims of 9/11.

“I would also like to recognize those individuals who have traveled to Washington today to attend this hearing, and thank you for coming. Many of are the very people who have been denied proper compensation thus far, and I hope that we can learn today about why the system has failed so many of you.

“After the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11, tens of thousands of first responders, residents, area workers, and students were exposed to a cocktail of toxic substances said to be worse than the Kuwaiti oil fires. They are now coming down with diseases like sarcoidosis, lymphoma, and rare blood cancers. Last June, Senator Clinton and I held companion hearings on the actions of the Environmental Protection Administration and other federal agencies that allowed workers to work in a toxic environment without proper protection and gave them false assurances as to their safety.

“At the House hearing, we heard the callous voice of former EPA Administrator Christie Todd Whitman try to explain why she told New Yorkers that the “air was safe to breathe” when, in fact, she had evidence to the contrary. We reviewed the EPA Inspector General’s report which found that her statements “were falsely reassuring, lacked a scientific basis, and were politically motivated.” We heard about how the White House changed EPA press releases, ‘to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones.’

“Obviously, none of the injuries we are talking about would have occurred were it not for the terrorists, who are ultimately to blame, but many or most would have been avoided if the Federal Government had acted in a responsible manner. The federal government, therefore, has a moral and legal obligation to compensate the victims of 9/11 and to provide for their health.

“Many hearings have examined the health issues and we have heard from many who are too sick to work. And we must assume that many more will become sick in the future. In a September 2006 peer-reviewed study conducted by the World Trade Center Medical Monitoring Program, of 9,500 WTC responders, almost 70 percent of them had a new or worsened respiratory symptom that developed during or after their time working at Ground Zero. Furthermore, another study documented that, on average, a New York City firefighter who responded to the World Trade Center has experienced a loss of 12 years of lung capacity.

“Which brings us to today’s hearing. We have with us the former Special Master of the federal Victim Compensation Program who was responsible for providing approximately $7.1 billion in compensation to the families of those who lost their lives and to those injured in the immediate aftermath of the attacks. He paid claims of about 2900 families of the deceased and 2500 people with physical injuries including respiratory illnesses. The funds he distributed were tax free and every award took into account the recoveries from collateral sources, such as private insurance, pensions, and workers compensation. Claims payments were halted because of a statutory expiration date.

“We will also hear from Mike Valentin a police officer and 9/11 first responder who can no longer work, and who long ago exhausted his prescription drug coverage and is now fighting to keep his family financially afloat. Unfortunately, his case is all too typical.

“New York City Corporation Counsel Michael Cardozo will discuss the World Trade Center Captive Insurance Company, which established with a $1 billion Congressional appropriation, has spent millions of dollars in administrative and legal costs to contest, rather than to pay, claims filed by first responders and other individuals whom Congress intended to assist. Only a handful of claims have been paid, and none of those have been related to the respiratory problems that so many suffer. I look forward to hearing from him how many claims have been paid out and what he sees as the challenges to compensating 9/11 victims.

“I am sure he will discuss last week’s Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision, denying New York City and its contractors immunity from World Trade Center-related lawsuits. Some 8,000 victims have filed suit, claiming that they “suffered respiratory injuries due to the failure of the City and the Port Authority to monitor those conditions and to provide them with adequate safety equipment, and/or warn them of the hazards.”

“Finally, I look forward to the testimony of Dr. Jim Melius who is an expert on the proposed legislative solutions to reopen the victim compensation program and to provide for the long term health needs of those affected by the attacks of 9/11.
“I would like to note that my colleagues, Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney and Congressman Vito Fossella, and I have introduced the 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, which would provide comprehensive medical treatment to any person whose health was affected, and reopen the Victim Compensation Fund so that people can be compensated for their economic losses.

“The pain and suffering of the living victims of 9/11 is real and cannot be ignored. I think it is clear that we, as a nation, must do more. During the final months of the Civil War, President Lincoln, in his Second Inaugural Address, noted that the nation had to beyond mourning the dead and needed to look towards what could be done to help the nation recover and reconstruct. Nearly seven years after 9/11, and we are in the same position. We must, as Lincoln remarked, “bind up the nation’s wounds [and] care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow, and his orphan.”

“I hope that as we continue to bring the truth to light through these hearings, we can do a better job of repaying a debt that can never fully be repaid to the victims and heroes of 9/11.”
 
GOP Rep. Darrell Issa under fire from everywhere after 9/11 comments

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2008/04/03/2008-04-03_gop_rep_darrell_issa_under_fire_from_eve.html

BY RICHARD SISK and MICHAEL McCAULIFF
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITERS
Thursday, April 3rd 2008, 4:00 AM

WASHINGTON - The California congressman who called the Sept. 11 attacks "simply" a plane crash ran for cover Wednesday under a barrage of ridicule from fellow Republicans, first responders and victims' families.

San Diego GOP Rep. Darrell Issa was under siege for suggesting the federal government had already done enough to help New York cope with "a fire" that "simply was an aircraft" hitting the World Trade Center.

"That is a pretty distorted view of things," said Frank Fraone, a Menlo Park, Calif., fire chief who led a 67-man crew at Ground Zero. "Whether they're a couple of planes or a couple of missiles, they still did the same damage."

"New York was attacked by Al Qaeda. It doesn't have to be attacked by Congress," added Long Island Rep. Pete King, a Republican.

"I'm really surprised by Darrell Issa," King added. "It showed such a cavalier dismissal of what happened to New York. It's wrong and inexcusable."

Lorie Van Auken, who lost her husband, Kenneth, in the attacks, slammed Issa's "cruel and heartless" comments.

"It's really discouraging. People stepped up and did the right thing. They sacrificed themselves and now a lot of people are getting really horrible illnesses," she added.

Under pressure from all sides, the Golden State pol - who got rich selling car alarms after getting busted for car theft as a teen - pulled a partial U-turn. He issued a statement but cowered from the press.

"I continue to support federal assistance for the victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks," he said.

But he didn't retract his wacked-out rhetoric claiming the feds "just threw" buckets of cash at New York for an attack "that had no dirty bomb in it, it had no chemical munitions in it."

He went on: "I have to ask ... why the firefighters who went there and everybody in the city of New York needs to come to the federal government for the dollars versus this being primarily a state consideration."

In his statement yesterday, Issa insisted he only "asked tough questions about the expenditures" during a hearing Tuesday on an aid bill for sick New Yorkers.

"He realized he stepped in it," said Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-Manhattan), who was leading the hearing when Issa popped off.

"The sound I'm hearing is him slamming the brakes and going in reverse," crowed Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-Brooklyn-Queens). Issa also belatedly admitted 9/11 was "an attack on America" in his statement.

It shouldn't have been that hard.

He took to the floor of Congress on Sept. 11, 2001, to argue passionately that America - not just New York - had been attacked, but conveniently forgot that during his Tuesday diatribe.

"It seems that with the passage of time, something happened along the way where the scope of the problem and the real extent of the problem has not drifted out to California," fumed Staten Island GOP Rep. Vito Fossella.

Health officials estimate it could cost $1 billion to care properly for the ailments that may emerge in the people who lived through the horror of Sept. 11 or breathed that toxic dust.

New York lawmakers now want Democratic leaders to bring the 9/11 care bill to the floor soon - before more members of Congress start spouting off like Issa.
 
GOP Rep. opposes sick Sept. 11 worker fund

http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2008/04/02/gop_rep_opposes_sick_sept_11_worker_fund/9377/

Published: April 2, 2008 at 9:08 PM

WASHINGTON, April 2 (UPI) -- A California congressman said Wednesday he has reservations about a proposed new fund for rescuers sickened by the 2001 terror attacks, not supporting victims.

At a hearing in Washington Tuesday, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., balked at the idea of a new compensation fund for emergency responders who fell ill after the Sept. 11 attacks in New York, the New York Daily News reported.

Issa insisted the airliners that crashed into the World Trade Center towers in New York were not weapons. He suggested the cause of illness for the responders was simply debris from the collapse of the towers.

"It simply was an aircraft, residue of two aircraft and residue from the materials used to build this building," Issa said.

Issa issued a statement Wednesday clarifying his position.

"During (Tuesday's) hearing, I asked tough questions. ... I continue to have reservations about the specific bill (Tuesday's) hearing focused on and I have questions about the appropriate way to determine federal and local responsibility to victims," Issa said. "I want to make clear that I strongly support help for victims who suffered physical injury as a result of an attack on America, including support from Congress and the federal government."
 
Lawmaker Criticized for 9/11 Comments

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5j-7v1hEkqd4GAf2kvups02v7wLtwD8VQOSQ80

By ERICA WERNER – 11 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — A conservative Republican congressman says he supports helping victims of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks but did not offer an apology for remarks he made while questioning the need for federal compensation.

Following criticism from fellow lawmakers and others, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., issued a statement Wednesday insisting he would "continue to support federal assistance for the victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks," although he did not specify how that should be done. He opposed reopening a victims compensation fund that expired in 2003 after distributing about $7 billion.

On Thursday, after more negative reaction to his remarks, Issa's spokesman Frederick Hill said, "The congressman recognizes he could have chosen his words better at the hearing."

During a joint hearing on Tuesday by two House Judiciary subcommittees considering legislation to extend benefits, Issa described the Sept. 11 attacks as "a fire that had no dirty bomb in it" and added: "It had no chemical munitions in it. It simply was an aircraft, residue of two aircraft and residue of the material used to build this building."

He questioned "why the firefighters who went there and everyone in the city of New York needs to come to the federal government for the dollars versus, quite frankly, this being primarily a state consideration."

Issa went on to say that he couldn't vote for additional money for New York "if I can't see why it would be appropriate to do this every single time a similar situation happens which, quite frankly, includes any urban terrorist. It doesn't have to be somebody from al-Qaida. It can be somebody who decides they don't like animal testing at one of our pharmaceutical facilities."

In opposing the legislation, Issa cited concerns about extending compensation to people who weren't physically injured and didn't work at Ground Zero. The bill would allow people who lived, worked or volunteered in the area to be compensated for psychological as well as physical problems.

His remarks immediately drew indignant responses from New York lawmakers at the hearing as well as from the witness he was questioning, Michael Cardozo, New York City's top lawyer.

"Congressman, this was I believe an attack on the United States of America. It was located at Ground Zero, but it was an attack on America," Cardozo retorted.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., who chaired the hearing, said in an interview Thursday that Issa's statements were "extremely rude, extremely stupid, extremely insensitive, extremely unpatriotic — to put it mildly."

Rep. Pete King, R-N.Y., said in a statement: "New York was attacked by al-Qaida. It doesn't have to be attacked by Congress. I'm really surprised by Darrell Issa. It showed such a cavalier dismissal of what happened to New York. It's wrong and inexcusable."
 
Justice for Ground Zero worker

http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local...008-04-08_justice_for_ground_zero_worker.html

BY RACHEL MONAHAN
Tuesday, April 8th 2008, 4:00 AM

Demetrius "Bo" Samadjopoulos has been a part of history. In the 1980s, he worked on restoring the Statue of Liberty.

For six weeks after 9/11, he pulled 12-hour shifts at Ground Zero.

"I'm not a hero. I went down to do a job," said Samadjopoulos, 49, of Park Slope, who worked for 15 years as a carpenter for the city's Transportation Department.

But Samadjopoulos was denied a pension, even though a World Trade Center medical expert and his own doctor found his work injuries from 9/11, along with the wear and tear of a demanding job, had disabled him.

"I'm not looking for free money. I'm looking for my measly $20,000 a year and medical coverage for my daughter," said Samadjopoulos.

In October 2006, a city medical board report found "the documentary and clinical evidence failed to substantiate that (Samadjopoulos) is disabled from performing the duties of carpenter."

Last week, however, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Walter Tolub annulled the medical board's decision, noting it "lacks a rational basis," after Samadjopoulos claimed his medical exam only lasted 15 minutes and did not "include any tests" of his respiratory ailments.

Samadjopoulos' lawyer, Gary Stone, hailed the judge's decision.

"It's quite a remarkable indictment of the medical board," said Stone, pension-unit director of South Brooklyn Legal Services. "It was a disturbing finding, if we think about how many people's cases get decided by the medical board."

Law Department spokeswoman Laura Postiglione said city lawyers would review the decision when they had received "a formal copy."

Samadjopoulos' doctor, Jacqueline Moline, director of the World Trade Center Monitoring and Treatment Program at Mount Sinai Medical Center, had supported his case for a pension.

"It is absolutely clear to me ... that Mr. Samadjopoulos is disabled as a result of his work at the World Trade Center site," she wrote.

Samadjopoulos said he left the private sector and went to work for the city for the security of a pension.

"It's a travesty," said Samadjopoulos. "Every time I hear Bloomberg ... saying all the things they're doing for people, I feel like puking."
 
9/11 Truth Tuesdays First Donation To The FealGood Foundation

As we have said from the very beginning, ALL proceeds from "9/11 Truth Tuesdays" are going to the FealGood Foundation to help the 9/11 First Responders we both love and respect because of the heroes that they are, and because they aren't getting the help that they need. We recently received a check from the Anthony Wayne Movie Theater for the first series that took place in January and February. There were a total of nine shows, including the special event that took place on 1/29. Everyone that attended during those nine shows should be proud of the fact that you helped to donate a total of $1746.00 to help the sick and dying 9/11 First Responders.

Betsy and I would especially like to thank Philly 9/11 Truth for raising a total of $315.00 on the night of 1/29.

I have said often that victories in 9/11 Truth are very few and far between. Each and every dollar that we contribute to help the ailing 9/11 First Responders is the equivalent of a 100 victories.

Thank you to everyone. I look forward to seeing you at the Anthony Wayne Movie Theater every Tuesday in April, and the first two Tuesdays in May at 7pm. The more people that come to these shows, the better our next donation will be. I hope to see A LOT of you there. :)
 
Sept. 11 charity investigated

http://www.njherald.com/secure_story/319534184007874.php

By TOM HOWELL JR.
[email protected]
Sunday, April 13, 2008

JEFFERSON — Bergen County Harley-Davidson employee Rich Croland was lucky, in a sense, to miss a benefit concert in Carlstadt last month that promoted its upcoming Freedom Ride to Ground Zero.

The company's charity partner, Fred Parisi, was led out of the March 29 event by police officers on charges he stole $235,000 from a business colleague in Jefferson.

"I got a call, saying, 'Hey, did you see the front of the (New York) Daily News today?'" Croland said.

As a result, the arrest cast skepticism on Parisi's 9/11 Rescue Workers Foundation, the charity he was in Carlstadt to raise funds for in conjunction with the Freedom Ride promotion.

For years, Parisi, 40, of Jefferson, has claimed he was called in from a police recruiting field in Brooklyn to assist rescue efforts at the World Trade Center in Manhattan on Sept. 11, 2001.

In September 2007, he set up his foundation to assist people who suffered medical problems related to the recovery site.

But according to an affidavit, Parisi was a police recruit assigned to Floyd Bennett Field for driving training on Sept. 11, 2001.

He did not respond to the World Trade Center catastrophe; he was assigned to a traffic post at 34th St. and Madison Avenue on the following two days, NYPD roster sheets said.

"This gives legitimate foundations a black eye," said John Feal, whose FealGood Foundation replaced Parisi's as a charity partner for the motorcycle run.

"As a foundation founder, I'm not surprised," he said. "As a 9/11 responder, I was irate."

The episode illustrated an all-too-common problem, observers said: Charities that cannot support their claims or spend more funds on their operations than the people they are supposed to help.

"You can legally give just about nothing to charity, and be so-called legitimate," said Daniel Borochoff, president and founder of the American Institute of Philanthropy.

Scams related to 9/11 were more common in the earlier part of the decade, when people were "emotionally moved and throwing money at whoever would collect it," Borochoff said.

Now, "if you really are clever about ripping people off, you'd know regulators will be watching (9/11 scams) more closely," Borochoff said.

In May 2004, a pair of Sussex County men pleaded guilty to bilking a Franklin woman out of $300,000 in a phony 9/11 investment plan, claiming she would receive $1 million in return.

One of the men, of Hampton, claimed he had shot a would-be terrorist who was planning attacks.

Parisi was arrested at the benefit concert on March 29 after a 15-month investigation alleging he stole $235,000 from his business partner, Roy Jensen, at Berkshire Valley Custom Wood Designs, police said.

His arrest prompted multiple agencies to investigate Parisi's 9/11 foundation and previous fund-raising, including an effort to send his son to a baseball tournament in Europe, Jefferson Police Detective Joseph Kratzel said.

Whether Parisi's 9/11 foundation provided real help to anyone is unclear. It is registered with the New Jersey Division of Consumers Affairs, and "there are no actions that we have taken against charities that are connected to 9-11," DCA spokesman Jeff Lamm said.

The charity's phone line has been disconnected, and Parisi is lodged in the Morris County jail on bail, pending an appearance before Superior Court Judge Salem V. Ahto on April 15.

The 9/11 Rescue Workers Foundation did not take in or spend any money in its most recent report posted online with the DCA.

"It's too easy to set up a charity in New Jersey that may pass the legal muster but is far from what it should be," said John Hulse said, a Byram police officer and Sussex County delegate to the New Jersey Police Benevolent Association.

The Police Benevolent Association outlawed telemarketing after it realized too many supposed police-based foundations used pressure tactics to spend more on operations than charity, Hulse said.

"Everybody used to do telemarketing and it wasn't that bad of a thing," he said.

But things went "haywire" in the early 1990s, when "you started hearing all these horror stories," he said.

Telemarketers took in most of the proceeds, including one group that fled to Florida, he said.

"That wasn't the exception; it started to become the rule," Hulse said. "We said enough is enough."

The PBA testified before the state Legislature in hopes of banning all telemarketing related to law enforcement charities, but it was rebuffed due to First Amendment concerns, according to Hulse.

"It's our reputation," Hulse said.

"We go to great lengths to protect the name of law enforcement."

Borochoff said potential givers should fully understand where their money is going and look for a charity directors they can trust to maximize the positive effects of their donation.

Feal said he wanted to protect 9/11 workers after his left foot was crushed by steel at the Ground Zero site. He noted that his foundation has an eight-member board, two lawyers and a well-maintained Web site with media links.

Croland called him a day before the FealGood Foundation planned to reach out to the Bergen County Harley-Davidson, the parties said.

"We made lemonade out of bad lemons," Feal said.
 
Complaints Over 9/11 Health Continue
Emotions ran high at a 9/11 Community Health Forum held downtown yesterday. A number of attendees spoke of their chronic health problems and the lack of federal health funds.

http://www.wnyc.org/news/articles/96815

by Arun Venugopal

NEW YORK, NY April 14, 2008 —REPORTER: Joseph Zadroga, father of the late first-responder James Zadroga, said the government should've been aware of the dangers at the World Trade Center site.

ZADROGA: This was just like Chernobyl, in Russia, where they had the Russians take wheelbarrows and dump it down into the nuclear reactor to stop the fire.

But, Doctor Joan Reibman of the World Trade Center Environmental Health Center said it's hard to determine which ailments are related to 9/11.

She said medical professionals have to look at when someone was working or living near the site and when their symptoms first occurred.

REIBMAN: And also, look at that in the context of what we're seeing in the other programs - in the Fire Department, in the responders, as well as in our program - to try to understand when certain symptoms are related. But there's an awful lot we still don't know.

REPORTER: Speakers also called for comprehensive healthcare services...and better research into 9/11-related illnesses.
 
$$ WAR WITH 9/11 CONTRACTORS

http://m.nypost.com/ms/p/nyp/nyp/view.m?pid=23907&storyid=106312

By SUSAN EDELMAN
4/14/2008

The city and its Ground Zero contractors have become embroiled in an explosive rift over who's responsible to pay 9/11 workers sickened during the World Trade Center cleanup, The Post has learned.

Splitting with Mayor Bloomberg for the first time, the contractors are now contending the city has no financial cap on its liability for claims from the cleanup.

The contractors have filed bombshell court papers saying they could be left holding the bag for "potentially enormous" costs if the burden of compensating sick 9/11 responders shifts to them.

They cite the Congressional Record, which shows Congress gave the city $1 billion for insurance to cover the debris-removal after the WTC collapse, with no apparent cap on those claims. The city sharply differs.

"The statute, legislative history and prior court decisions make clear that the cap applies to debris-removal cases," Connie Pankratz, a spokeswoman for the city Law Department, said Friday.

Immediately after 9/11, the Air Transportation Safety and Stabilization Act - which also protected the airlines - capped the city's liability for the "terrorist-related aircraft crashes" at $350 million or the city's insurance, whichever is greater.

The contractors say settlement with ill workers will be impossible until the court decides which side is right.

Lawyers for the suing firefighters, cops and other workers filed papers last week agreeing with the contractors - and urging US Judge Alvin Hellerstein to resolve the issue quickly.
 
NY appeals court: Whitman not liable in Sept. 11 air case
NY appeals court finds former EPA chief Whitman cannot be held liable for 9/11 air comments

http://www.rawstory.com/news/mochila/NY_appeals_court_Whitman_not_liable_04222008.html

LARRY NEUMEISTER
Apr 22, 2008 09:31 EST

Former EPA chief Christine Todd Whitman cannot be held liable for telling residents near the World Trade Center site that the air was safe to breathe after the 2001 terrorist attacks, a federal appeals court said Tuesday.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Whitman apparently made comments reassuring people about the safety around the site based on conflicting information and reassurances by the White House.

The appeals court said legal remedies are not always available for every instance of arguably deficient governmental performance.

A Department of Justice lawyer had argued late last year that holding the former head of the Environmental Protection Agency liable would set a dangerous precedent in future disasters because public officials would fear making public statements.

The ruling came in response to a lawsuit by residents, students and workers in lower Manhattan and Brooklyn who said they were exposed to hazardous dust and debris from the fallen twin towers after Sept. 11.

They said Whitman, who also is a former New Jersey governor, should be forced to pay damages to properly clean homes, schools and businesses.

A lower court judge had earlier refused to dismiss Whitman as a defendant, saying her actions were "conscience-shocking."
 
Ex-EPA chief Christie Todd Whitman can't be held liable in 9/11 air case

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2008/04/22/2008-04-22_exepa_chief_christie_todd_whitman_cant_b.html

BY TRACY CONNOR
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
Wednesday, April 23rd 2008, 1:54 AM

Christie Whitman, at least, can breathe easy.

An appeals court ruled Tuesday that the former EPA chief can't be punished for falsely telling New Yorkers the air near Ground Zero was safe after 9/11.

Even though thousands were sickened by toxic dust, the federal judges decided Whitman isn't personally liable for inaccurate reassurances she gave to the public.

The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals cited her "inadequate management" and the Environmental Protection Agency's "flawed" handling of the crisis.

But the 28-page ruling said there was no evidence Whitman knew she was dispensing lies and her decision to go along with a White House whitewash didn't "shock the conscience."

Whitman applauded the appellate court's order to dismiss the class-action suit after a district judge ruled it should go forward.

"9/11 confronted all of us with decisions that were unprecedented in our history," said Whitman, who stepped down from the EPA in 2003.

"I am pleased that the court today confirmed what I have said - that we at the EPA acted reasonably and made every effort to protect the people of New York."

The collapse of the twin towers released a cloud of hazardous dust, including lead and asbestos, across lower Manhattan.

But a week after the terrorist attacks, while the fires at Ground Zero were still burning, Whitman told New Yorkers "their air is safe to breathe and their water is safe to drink."

Daily News columnist Juan Gonzalez showed that was untrue by unearthing the EPA's own air quality studies - and last year he shamed Whitman into testifying about the mess before Congress.

Yesterday's ruling was blasted by the plaintiffs and others who support first responders, recovery workers and local residents who became ill after the fall of the towers.

"One argument after another appalls me with its illogic," said Jenna Orkin, whose son was a student at Stuyvesant High School near the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001.

She was particularly incensed by the court's reasoning that Whitman isn't liable because she was following orders from the White House Council on Environmental Quality.

"What has jumped out at me so far is the way the buck is being passed," Orkin said. "This is sleight of hand."

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-Manhattan) was concerned by the ruling that even if Whitman knew she was giving false information, she would have immunity unless she intended to harm the victims.

"This interpretation means that government officials in the future can deceive the public and harm thousands of people with impunity," said Nadler, who grilled Whitman at a congressional hearing last year.

"That should shock everyone's conscience."

Activist John Feal said there's only one punishment for Whitman that fits the crime. "She should go to jail for manslaughter," he said.
 
Rep. Nadler: Decision In 9/11 Lawsuit Highlights Need For Federal Action

CONGRESSMAN JERROLD NADLER
8th Congressional District of New York

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Tuesday, April 22, 2008

CONTACT: Shin Inouye, 202-225-5635

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Congressman Jerrold Nadler (NY-08), chair of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties today issued the following statement regarding the Second Circuit Court of Appeal's decision that former Environmental Protect Agency Administrator Christine Todd Whitman is immune from liability for false statements she made about air quality and public safety after the collapse of the World Trade Center in 2001:

"I am deeply disappointed with the Second Circuit's decision. There is a mountain of evidence demonstrating that Ms. Whitman and the Bush administration mislead the public about air quality in the aftermath of the collapse of the World Trade Center. By falsely assuring the public that the air was safe to breathe - when all the evidence indicated that it was in fact extremely hazardous - she caused thousands of residents, workers, and first responders to suffer injury and, in some cases, death due to unnecessary exposure to toxins released by the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings. Much of this evidence has been made public in hearings held last year by Senator Clinton and me.

"Perhaps most upsetting is the court's apparent justification of Ms. Whitman's lies as a 'realistic choice' among 'competing governmental considerations' due to her attempt to 'reassure the public,' even though by doing so she put the public's health in jeopardy. The decision also noted that even if Ms. Whitman knowingly made these false statements, she would still enjoy immunity unless it could be proven that she also intended to harm the victims. If permitted to stand, this interpretation means that government officials in the future can deceive the public and harm thousands of people with impunity. That should shock everyone's conscience.

"Regardless of whether the plaintiffs choose to appeal this ruling, one thing is clear - the federal government needs to act. While these legal cases have been ongoing, the living victims of 9/11 continue to suffer. Congress must pass the 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, authored by myself, Congresswoman Maloney and Congressman Fossella, to provide medical care and compensation to thousands of Americans whose health has been compromised. The decision also makes clear that Congress needs to demand a proper test and clean up of the affected areas.

"When the judiciary and the executive fail to provide justice to the living victims of 9/11, it is the moral imperative of Congress to do right. Nearly seven years after 9/11, and the federal government still has not met its obligations. We can, and must, do more."

###​

Jerrold Nadler has served in Congress since 1992. He represents New York's 8th Congressional District, which includes parts of Manhattan and Brooklyn.
 
I love you John Feal. You crazy 9/11 first responding, kidney donating, foundation that helps 9/11 first responders foundering (sp?), tattoo lovin' guy.
 
"Freedom Run" To Benefit 9/11 Responders - Motorcycle Rally And Festival At Liberty State Park

08-0428-FealGoodFd_72dpi.jpg

http://www.send2press.com/newswire/2008-04-0425-003.shtml

Published: Fri, 25 Apr 2008, 20:14:42 GMT
Edited by Carly Zander

HACKENSACK, N.J., April 25 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) -- Over 2,000 motorcycles are expected to roll past New York's "Ground Zero" on Saturday, May 10, as they participate in the "Freedom Run" motorcycle rally and festival. Riding side-by-side, the motorcycles are anticipated to stretch for five miles and will pay tribute to the 9/11 first responders of the FealGood Foundation who are now gravely ill as a result of their service at the site of the World Trade Center collapse.

Caption: FealGood Foundation"I am overwhelmed by the outpouring of love from the motorcycle community. We are grateful for the support of Bergen Harley-Davidson, and pledge that every dollar raised will help give dignity to a 9/11 responder who has been forgotten by their government," says John Feal, president and founder of the FealGood Foundation. The nonprofit organization advocates and raises money for the 40,000 who came from all over America and the world to do search, recovery and clean up at Ground Zero, 70 percent of whom are now sick or have died.

Leading the motorcycles will be NYFD Engine #343, named in honor of the 343 NYC firefighters who perished in the attacks, which will be ridden my numerous rescue workers and first responders. The run will depart from the Hackensack Court House, 10 Main Street, at 11:00 a.m., and travel across the George Washington Bridge before passing the Ground Zero.

At the site, motorcyclists will pay homage to a police and fire department color guard before proceeding through the Holland Tunnel and out to Liberty Island. The pack arrive at Liberty State Park at roughly 1:30 and take part in a festival of food, live music by The Rolling Bones, motorcycle high wire thrill show, fly-over by the War Birds historic military aircraft, and more.

"This is an unprecedented event here in the New York and New Jersey area," says Liz DiGennaro of Bergen Harley-Davidson-Buell, sponsor of the event. "We hope it will bring attention to the real American heroes who spent days and months sifting through the rubble of the burning buildings looking for survivors and bringing dignity to those who perished."

The police-escorted run and festival are free and all models of bikes are welcome. For more information or to register call 201-843-6930 or visit www.FealGoodFoundation.com.
 
Back
Top