Who Is? Archives

puffin3 said:
I'm asking again WHERE are these people? Why haven't they come forward and agreed to be interviewed on camera. I just can't believe all these people are being threatened or paid off by the government. As far as "facts" are concerned IF they are facts it should be no problem PROVING them should it. I have an open mind but it is still a mind. What about the Popular Mechanics article?
I new to the possibility that 9/11 was a put-up job but I'm not going to believe 'his friend was there and he told my sister who told me' arguements. From what I read on this forum that seems to be the main source of 'the truth'. That doesn't cut it for me.
The PM article was taken apart right in this forum. You strike me as a dick, sir. You post in the wrong thread about a topic NO ONE here was debating in the first place. Straighten it out, or I'll make good on Jons threat.
 
From my observations, AuG strikes me as the kind of gent who certainly isn't lacking in the "oysters" department either...
 
dMole said:
From my observations, AuG strikes me as the kind of gent who certainly isn't lacking in the "oysters" department either...
Thank you sir!
 
puffin3 said:
I'm asking again WHERE are these people? Why haven't they come forward and agreed to be interviewed on camera. I just can't believe all these people are being threatened or paid off by the government. As far as "facts" are concerned IF they are facts it should be no problem PROVING them should it. I have an open mind but it is still a mind. What about the Popular Mechanics article?
I new to the possibility that 9/11 was a put-up job but I'm not going to believe 'his friend was there and he told my sister who told me' arguements. From what I read on this forum that seems to be the main source of 'the truth'. That doesn't cut it for me.

Where is who? Name someone.
 
He wants to know where the passengers on the PLANES went Jon. You know, that and controlled demolition, the only things this movement is all about.
 
AuGmENTor said:
He wants to know where the passengers on the PLANES went Jon. You know, that and controlled demolition, the only things this movement is all about.

Ok. I guess he doesn't know that I'm someone that thinks Flight 77 did hit the Pentagon, and am not 100% convinced that Controlled Demolition took place at the towers or building 7.
 
Gold9472 said:
and am not 100% convinced that Controlled Demolition took place at the towers or building 7.
Well, about THAT I AM convinced, but it certainly isn't the big guns I drag out when arguing 911.
 
Do you know what makes me distrust the idea of Controlled Demolition the most? The fact that it's the #1 thing the media, and the "debunkers" use against us. I don't understand the science, nor do I understand what should have happened to those buildings. I like Dr. Jones, Willie Rodriguez, and Kevin Ryan. However, liking someone, and understanding what they're saying and being able to comment on it, is two entirely different things. I think they are legitimate which is why I continue to post their information, but I don't KNOW that they are legitimate, and guess what... I'm not exactly a trusting person to begin with (hence the reason I'm here). The question that goes through my head again and again is, "If Controlled Demolition actually did take place at the WTC, would the controlled media mention it, and use it against us as often as they have?" Yes, I know the bigger the lie... blah blah blah...
 
There are reasons to think it might have been Controlled Demolition without referencing the "science." The offices within WTC7 for instance. Some "shady" organizations in there. It looks like a Controlled Demolition. I won't deny that. The fact that NIST has yet to release a report on Building 7. There are other reasons... but you get the gist.
 
It's win win for them. Even if it WAS CD, no one would believe it for the reasons stated ad nausium. AND the controlled media COULD use it as they have as our plattform of insanity. I wont argue with you, as you make a good point.
 
Bring on the science- or probably not...

"The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists."

J. Edgar Hoover, former head of the FBI.

I'd love to dive face-first into a big, greasy discussion about the chemistry/metallurgy, det-cord, blasting caps, brisance, demolition waves, blast fronts, melting points, ultimate yield, structural integrity, and those elusive 47 central WTC tower core columns, but I'm probably already waayy too engineer-speak for most people's attention span. :(

I do understand much of the science, but that's a pretty small list of people educated enough, brave enough, and open-minded enough to even have this discussion. Dr. Jones, K. Ryan, Tony Szamboti, [and me, but I might be too "cryptic" for anybody to take me seriously and I guard my privacy like I would a child's safety- famous ain't really my thing] really ought to do lunch sometime.
 
Gold9472 said:
Hey... have you guys learned anything from this?
First impression...I'm pretty damn ignorant as to who the players are/were.

Second impression...I'm spoiled by all the excellent efforts that you and other people (at cooperative reserach and other places) put into these projects.

Third impression...As usual, I'm inspired to keep plugging away at leanring about and sharing this knowledge with other people.


=========================

And like 'simuvac' said earlier:

Please donate to CooperativeResearch.org:

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/donate.jsp

They are the best ally of 9/11 Truth.
 
Back
Top