Does Anyone Have Any Questions?

What's on cooperativeresearch.org. I'm asking if you agree with what they have to say.
 
jetsetlemming said:
What's on cooperativeresearch.org. I'm asking if you agree with what they have to say.

They really don't "say" anything. It's more of a resource... Paul has never been one to "theorize". He considers himself a collector of information.
 
So what's your theory? I'm specifically interested in how much of the common knowledge of 9/11 do you think is true.
 
jetsetlemming said:
So what's your theory? I'm specifically interested in how much of the common knowledge of 9/11 do you think is true.

My theory is that the Neoconservative movement, and the corporations they represent, have slowly taken our Government away from us.

My initial suspicion was that somehow the Bush Administration was behind 9/11. It started when Bush and Cheney asked Tom Dashcle to "limit the scope of the investigations".

On my own, I did a lot of research into Bush, the organizations within the Government, and I did A LOT of reading into history. Certain things were happening that seemed to happen before. Literally, history was repeating itself.

Then I started to read other people's writings. Like Dr. Griffin, Michael Ruppert, John Judge, Kyle Hence, and was introduced organizations like 911CitizensWatch.org, and 911Truth.org.

These people had done a lot of their own research... to a level beyond mine, but using some of the same methods, etc... They had developed their own theories into what happened, and I researched them. I said... ok, this person thinks that, is there a way to confirm it. Using A LOT of their sourced information, and finding things on my own, I confirmed A LOT.

To say what I think happened is my theory, would be inaccurate. I can show you people's works, and show you who's theories I happen to agree with, but I can't claim one as my own.
 
What parts of the report that you don't think is true is most likely to be true, or at least close to true?
 
jetsetlemming said:
What parts of the report that you don't think is true is most likely to be true, or at least close to true?

If I don't think it's true, it's for a reason. It's not something I made up in my mind as being false. There's a reason I think that way. Those reasons make it impossible for me to claim that any part of the Commission's report is true.
 
I mean, what's still up in there air, doesn't have as much dissproving evidence as the others. What has a chance of being true.
 
jetsetlemming said:
I mean, what's still up in there air, doesn't have as much dissproving evidence as the others. What has a chance of being true.

Whether or not Muslims were involved.
 
Gold9472 said:
I did. But I don't think it's Howard's board. Just another copy.
Yup, your right....but I looked through the members list, there's alot of cool people. I'll probably pop in there occasionally. I have been pretty busy lately.
 
Back
Top